Last update: 14/07/2025
10 min readWe live in an era marked by the growing emergence and development of cryptocurrencies as a digital form of money or a digital investment asset. At the same time, global economic order is increasingly threatened by rising protectionism. In other words, the globalization we have witnessed in recent decades is starting to falter, and in some respects, we are even observing signs of slight deglobalization.
Here are the cornerstone questions posed by experts at BITmarkets for the benefit of the crypto community’s shared knowledge:
The analysis presented is a summary of findings by a team of experts from the analytical department of BITmarkets.
The world has seen remarkable transformations in recent decades, from breakthroughs in technology to the rise of interconnected economies. As global trade, finance, and communication networks expanded, new opportunities emerged—but so did fresh challenges.
Bitcoin didn’t emerge in isolation. It arrived at a time when the world was growing more connected than ever before—economies interwoven, technology advancing, and financial systems becoming increasingly global. But it also arrived when cracks were beginning to show: the 2008–2009 financial crisis exposed vulnerabilities in traditional finance, shaking public confidence and highlighting the risks of centralized control.
This context of global expansion and systemic fragility created fertile ground for a decentralized, peer-to-peer system like Bitcoin. Its limited supply, borderless design, and resistance to manipulation offered a radically new way to store and transfer value, one that could be accessed by anyone, anywhere, regardless of background or wealth.
While not a direct consequence of globalization, Bitcoin’s rise was made possible by the same forces that enabled global integration: advances in technology, expanding networks, and a growing demand for systems that transcend borders and barriers. In this sense, Bitcoin can be seen as a by-product of globalization. The world and the modern era had become ready for a globally participated financial space where anyone, regardless of background, social status, or financial capacity, could invest, transact, or send value across borders without reliance on intermediaries or centralized authorities.
What began with Bitcoin has evolved into a diverse and expanding ecosystem of digital assets, enabling participation across industries: from cross-border remittances and stablecoins offering dollar-like stability for the masses to real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, unlocking new possibilities in real estate, commodities, and beyond. This shift is transforming the global financial landscape. The adoption of cryptocurrencies is no longer limited to individual traders; institutions are allocating capital, governments are exploring strategic reserves, and digital assets are increasingly seen as tools for diversification, resilience, and alternative means of value transfer.
This study examines whether the forces of globalization—characterized by technological advancements, economic interdependence, and the spread of global networks—have created an environment conducive to the rise of Bitcoin and the broader crypto ecosystem, or the opposite, whether Bitcoin is resilient and not limited to the shifts and reversals in the process of globalization. It seeks to explore whether the emergence of Bitcoin signals a broader shift toward a decentralized financial system that transcends borders, institutions, and traditional barriers to participation.
Ali Daylami
Head of Analytical Department
BITmarkets
Globalization is a term that has been used frequently in recent years, especially since the Covid pandemic, which has affected the world and global economic relations by exposing the risks associated with a high degree of globalization. That is, excessive reliance on supply chain optimization can lead to disruption—or more adversely, a breakdown—of global supply chains when a crisis such as an infectious disease pandemic arrives.
Suddenly, the priority shifted from minimizing production costs at all costs to simply ensuring that certain products would still be available in stores. The Covid pandemic revealed just how vulnerable the world can be—and how fragile global economic relations truly are. One could say the crisis gave a definitive push to a process we now recognize as deglobalization.
How Do We Measure Globalization
Only time will tell how much of this shift is temporary—a short-term move toward greater economic localization and national independence from foreign suppliers. But the fact is that globalization has been stagnating at least since the financial crisis of 2008–2009, and the Covid-19 pandemic dealt it a severe blow.
Still, when we talk about globalization, it is important to understand what it is and how it can be measured. According to the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), globalization is a process of growing interdependence of the world’s economies, cultures, and populations, brought about by cross-border trade in goods and services, technology, and flows of investment, people, and information. Countries have built economic partnerships to facilitate these movements over many centuries. The term “globalization” gained popularity after the Cold War in the early 1990s, as these cooperative arrangements began to shape modern everyday life.
There are several indicators used to measure globalization and express the degree of economic cooperation between countries worldwide. The following three are among the most widely used and recognized:
Trade Openness Index
The Trade Openness Index is one of the measures of globalization. It is a ratio of world exports and imports to world GDP. It is a reasonable proxy for international economic integration. According to this index, globalization began roughly when countries started to trade with one another. Humanity has experienced several periods of globalization throughout history, with alternating periods of deepening international relations and rising protectionism.
Economic integration and globalization increased after the Industrial Revolution, which occurred at the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries. The Peterson Institute for International Economics defines the first era of pure globalization as spanning 1870 to 1914. During this period, the economic integration was driven by the steamship and other advances that allowed more goods to be moved more cheaply between markets.
Globalization reversed in the second period, from the outbreak of World War I in 1914 until the end of World War II in 1945. World War I produced prolonged economic dislocation, which included the withdrawal of the Soviet Union from global trade after the communist revolution in 1917, the Spanish flu pandemic in 1918, monetary instability in the early 1920s, new immigration restrictions, the Great Depression beginning in 1929, and a severe outbreak of protectionism in the 1930s.
Economic integration rebounded in the third period, the three decades following World War II. American leadership helped create new institutions for economic cooperation, such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (now the World Trade Organization), enabling countries to reopen their economies to trade and investment. These steps helped usher in a golden age of growth.
During the fourth period, from the 1980s until the financial crisis of 2008/2009, economic integration rose to a historically unprecedented global scale. Led by China and India, developing countries began dismantling trade barriers. The Soviet Bloc in Eastern Europe moved toward democracy and economic liberalization with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, followed by the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Changes in technology—including shipping containers and improvements in information and communication technologies—also fuelled integration and led to the creation of global supply chains. Global growth was strong, and world poverty fell significantly. The Trade Openness Index reached the 60 percent level before the onset of the financial crisis.
Today, we are living in the fifth era of globalization, often referred to as the era of “slowbalization” or deglobalization. The Trade Openness Index now seems to be stagnating or oscillating around the 60% level. As it seemed that the global economy might resume globalization, the Covid pandemic reversed this trend, and the globalization process effectively stopped, as illustrated in the following figure. This period of slowbalization began roughly at the same time the first cryptocurrency was “born”.
Figure 1: Phases of globalization (measured by Trade Openness Index)
KOF Globalisation Index (KOFGI)
The KOFGI is a composite index that measures globalization along the economic, social and political dimensions for almost every country in the world, based on a scale of 1 (least) to 100 (most globalized). The index spans from 1970 to the most current year. The data is updated annually.
The original index was introduced by German economist Axel Dreher in 2006 at the Konjunkturforschungsstelle of ETH Zürich, and updated two years later. Recently, the index was completely overhauled and expanded with new features and variables.
The revised and updated KOFGI distinguishes between de facto and de jure measures for each of the different aspects of globalization. While de facto globalization measures actual international flows and activities (such as trade in goods and services), de jure globalization measures policies and conditions (such as tariffs) that, in principle, affect these flows and activities. Within the economic dimension of globalization, the revised KOFGI now distinguishes between trade and financial globalization.
Furthermore, it introduces time-varying weighting of the underlying variables, allowing the underlying relationship to gradually change over time. Overall, the index is based on 43 different variables that are aggregated into the different dimensions and the overall index. Incorporating a total 27 different indices, users can choose the level of aggregation most relevant for their respective purpose.
The KOFGI also affirms the path of globalization observed over the last several decades, as measured by the Trade Openness Index. According to the KOFGI, globalization accelerated since the beginning of the 1990s, as the Soviet Bloc collapsed and the former socialist countries began transitioning to standard market economies.
Moreover, according to the KOFGI, we can observe that “slowbalization” started right after the global financial crisis of 2008–2009, while after the Covid crisis, the globalization process has effectively halted. This is observable in both components to the KOFGI—meaning both de jure and de facto terms.
Figure 2: Globalization development measured by KOFGI
Source: ETH Zürich
Frankel Index (FI)
This specialized globalization measure was introduced by American economist Jeffrey Frankel at the turn of the 20th century. He devised a very simple yet insightful index to assess not only the extent but also the path of globalization.
The import version of the FI is a ratio that relates a country’s import share of GDP to the rest of the world’s GDP in global GDP. For example, if a country imports 30 percent of its GDP, and the rest of the world’s GDP is 80 percent of global GDP, the FI would be calculated as 30 percent÷ 80 percent, or 0.375.
If a country’s residents buy from foreigners as easily as they buy from domestic suppliers, then foreign products would represent the same share in that country’s spending as spending by citizens from the rest of the world. With complete globalization, a country’s import share of GDP should equal the share of the rest of the world’s GDP in global GDP—in other words, the FI should equal 1.0. That means: the higher a country’s FI, the more integrated it is with the global economy—or “more globalized”. Except for small open economies, such as Singapore, with very high trade ratios, the FI value is typically well below 1.0. In fact, the index consistently declines as a country’s share of world GDP rises.
Since 2000, FI values have generally increased due to China’s emergence as a trading power. German economist Rolf Langhammer sampled more than 100 countries to examine the evolution of FI values over time (1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005). Langhammer’s analysis revealed a pattern of smaller FI values for larger countries (measured by GDP) in a given year, but rising FI values over time for the great majority of countries—along with some degree of convergence in globalization between large and small economies.
The Frankel Index also shows that globalization has increased since 1990. The Peterson Institute for International Economics presents the change of FI data from 1990 to 2023 using the sample of 68 countries, as well as separate groups of 35 high-income countries and 33 middle-income countries. All three samples demonstrate that globalization has increased, although at slightly different paces across each group of countries (see Figures 3, 4, and 5).
Figure 3: Frankel Index for a group of 68 countries
Figure 4: Frankel Index for a group of 68 high-income countries
Figure 5: Frankel Index for a group of 68 middle-income countries
Let us recall that the aim of the submitted analysis is to verify whether the degree of globalization is related to the development of the cryptocurrency market. In other words, we are examining the hypothesis that improvements in globalization lead to growth in the cryptocurrency market, as measured by the market capitalization of major cryptocurrencies.
The market capitalization of the entire cryptocurrency market currently (mid-June 2025) stands at approximately 3.4 trillion USD, with Bitcoin dominating the market—holding a market share of around 60 percent. The top 5 cryptocurrencies with the greatest market capitalization together represent (mid-June 2025) more than 80 percent of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization.
Since our analysis aims to determine whether the extent of globalization goes hand-in-hand with the expansion of the cryptocurrency market, we decided to focus solely on Bitcoin. The reason is simple: Bitcoin is the world’s oldest cryptocurrency and has the longest historical track record.
The Birth of Bitcoin
Bitcoin is the first decentralized cryptocurrency. It is based on a free-market ideology and was invented in 2008 when an unknown entity published a white paper under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. The use of Bitcoin as a currency began in 2009, initially with no market price.
Among all asset classes, Bitcoin has had one of the most volatile trading histories. The cryptocurrency’s first significant price increase occurred in October 2010 when the value of a single Bitcoin started moving past its long flat price of less than $0.10. It was only a few months earlier (specifically in July 2010) that Bitcoin started being traded. Its price jumped from its long-held level of $0.10 to $0.20 on Oct. 26, 2010. Before the year had closed out, it had reached $0.30.
The initial market capitalization of Bitcoin (in July 2010) was no more than $197,000 USD. But very soon, as the price of Bitcoin started to increase, its market capitalization rose accordingly. Just two years later, Bitcoin’s market capitalization reached almost $90 million USD. At the turn of March and April 2013, Bitcoin’s market capitalization broke the $1 billion USD level. For the first time, Bitcoin was traded for more
The Story of Bitcoin’s Rise and Volatility
Bitcoin quickly became very popular, and its price soared, as did its market capitalization. At the turn of 2017, the price of Bitcoin reached its first major peak near the $18,000 USD level. Shortly after, its price collapsed below $4,000 USD. Right after the outbreak of the Covid pandemic, it seemed that Bitcoin was slowly dying. Its price stagnated around the level of $9,000 USD.
But it soon recovered and rose to the new all-time high level above 60 thousand USD. Nevertheless, it was not the end of the story of volatility. As the Covid crisis faded, Bitcoin’s price collapsed again and dropped to nearly $16,000 USD. This occurred in late 2022, when inflation started to increase rapidly.
In the following months, Bitcoin’s price started to increase, and in the late 2024, it broke the $100,000 USD level for the first time (see Figures 6 and 7). One could say that Bitcoin is becoming increasingly perceived as digital gold, as for some investors, it represented a good store of value amid inflation.
Today, Bitcoin is still traded above the $100,000 USD level but remains sensitive to both negative and positive developments in the global economy or economic policy, especially from the USA.
When it comes to the relationship between Bitcoin and the globalization of the world economy, there is no such evidence that these two variables directly influence each other. In fact, Bitcoin was introduced during the aftermath of the financial and global economic crisis of 2008–2009. In other words, Bitcoin is a child of the beginning of the “slowbalization” period.
Since then, we have observed a steady rise in the market capitalization of Bitcoin, along with the “birth” of new types of cryptocurrencies. Yes, it is true that the price of Bitcoin was oscillating during its early years, as did the stage of globalization following the financial crisis. Nowadays, however, the rise of cryptocurrencies appears irreversible—unlike the extent of globalization.
Figure 6: All-time price of Bitcoin (as of 15th June 2025, in USD)
Source: CoinMarketCap
Figure 7: All-time Bitcoin market capitalization (as of 15th June 2025, in USD)
Source: CoinMarketCap
So, what kind of events impact Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency market as a whole? According to a study by Standard Chartered Bank, Bitcoin seems to be more closely correlated with the Nasdaq index than with gold in most cases. As a result, investors may benefit from viewing it similarly to a major tech stock.
According to the bank, Bitcoin’s correlation with the Nasdaq index currently stands at around 0.5, down from 0.8 earlier this year. Meanwhile, its correlation with gold has been declining since January, briefly hitting zero and now hovering just above 0.2.
Figure 8: 20-year gold price (as of mid-June 2025, in USD per oz.)
Source: Goldprice
Figure 9: All-time Nasdaq index development (as of mid-June 2025)
Source: Yahoo Finance
When Bitcoin behaves more like a technology stock than a currency, it can be argued that it is more sensitive to the same factors as big-tech stocks. We have recently seen the causes behind the relatively sharp drop in technology stocks: unpredictable government economic policies. In addition, technology stocks are influenced by the monetary policy of central banks (especially the Fed) and the general economic development worldwide.
The correlation between cryptocurrencies and globalization may be mediated primarily through global economic development. In other words, if global economic development depends on the extent of globalization, then the development of the cryptocurrency market may also be partially dependent on globalization. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies as part of the disruptive economic forces might not follow the traditional measures of economic development.
Bearing in mind the disruptive and, at the same time, alternative nature of the cryptocurrencies in the economic environment, and the unproven hypothesis of correlation between Bitcoin and globalization, we may conclude that, given the expertise so far, there is no clear relationship. The Bitcoin market may be developing further rather independently from the major indicators of economic globalization.
BITmarkets continues to reshape the way digital assets are used by both retail and institutional clients. Our goal is to make cryptocurrency accessible, straightforward, and better connected with the wider financial world.
BITmarkets focuses on allowing real-world use of digital assets through a foundation built on trust, strong compliance, security, and transparency. As regulatory frameworks for digital assets mature globally, BITmarkets aligns its operations to keep pace with changing legal standards, supporting compliant innovation and long-term sustainability.
Our commitment to customer support remains unmatched, with multilingual assistance available around the clock in over 17 languages, effectively assisting traders to fully benefit from a wide range of products and features.
Over the past years, BITmarkets has been recognized with several prestigious international awards, reflecting our hard work and the quality of the services we provide. We are proud to be acknowledged not just as a trading platform—we are here to support people as they explore new financial possibilities.
As decentralized technologies become more widely adopted, BITmarkets continues to bridge traditional financial services and blockchain innovation. Our comprehensive suite of products is designed to support both retail and institutional clients in managing digital assets securely and efficiently.
of funds in cold storage
near-zero downtime with hot upgrades
order request(s)
infrastructure
© 2025 BITmarkets. All rights reserved.
Crypto assets as unregulated, decentralised and highly volatile assets entail substantial risks, and you may lose all invested capital.